Abstract
Acetylcholine‐induced contractions of the rat isolated anococcygeus muscle were blocked by atropine (0.1 μm), slightly enhanced by hexamethonium (0.1 mm) and tetrodotoxin (1 μm), but little affected by prazosin (0.1 μm). In the presence of the α2‐adrenoceptor agonist, UK14304, which raised the tone of the muscle, acetylcholine had a biphasic effect consisting of an initial relaxation followed by a contraction. Atropine (0.1 μm) enhanced the relaxant component and abolished the contractile component of the response, whereas tetrodotoxin, ω‐conotoxin GVIA or hexamethonium abolished or greatly reduced the relaxant component. The nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor NG‐nitro‐l‐arginine methyl ester (l‐NAME, 100 μm) increased acetylcholine‐induced contractions in the absence of UK14304 and markedly reduced the relaxant component to acetylcholine in the presence of UK14304. The effects of l‐NAME were annulled by l‐arginine (300 μm). The results suggest that acetylcholine acts concurrently on muscarinic receptors of the smooth muscle to cause contraction and nicotinic receptors of nitrergic nerves to cause relaxation. The observed response is the resultant of these two opposing effects and depends also on the prevailing tone. 1993 British Pharmacological Society
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1479-1482 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | British Journal of Pharmacology |
Volume | 110 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 1993 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Acetylcholine
- anococcygeus muscle
- hexamethonium
- muscarinic actions
- N‐nitro‐l‐arginine methyl ester (l‐NAME)
- NANC transmission
- nicotinic actions
- nitric oxide
- tetrodotoxin
- ω‐conotoxin