Monitoring postoperative pulmonary embolisms in australia—i. Variation between hospitals

Paul P. Fahey, Robert W. Gibberd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Information on inter-hospital variation in clinical outcomes can be extracted from routinely collected morbidity data in Australia. Postoperative pulmonary embolism rates, one of seven clinical performance indicators now subject to review during Australian hospitals’ quality accreditation surveys, is used as an example throughout. Using indirect statistical standardisation and Poisson models of random variation, we were able to identify five hospitals which recorded statistically significantly higher pulmonary embolism rates than average and three which recorded lower than expected rates. The application of these methods to all hospital outcome measures will assist in objectively monitoring the quality of patient care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-380
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1993
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Ginical indicators
  • Quality monitoring
  • Statistical methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Monitoring postoperative pulmonary embolisms in australia—i. Variation between hospitals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this