Mothers of a child with Down syndrome : a qualitative analysis of the perspectives on non-invasive prenatal testing

Chelsea Valentin, Andy Smidt, Rebecca Barton, Nathan J. Wilson, Bethea How

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome (DS) has sparked social and ethical debates. To date, in-depth exploration of the voices of Australian mothers of a child with DS about NIPT has been lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the perspectives of Australian mothers of a child with DS towards the increasing availability of NIPT. Design and Setting: Fifteen mothers of children with DS aged 8 months–39 years participated in-depth interviews, conducted online via the software Zoom™. An inductive thematic analysis of interview data explored mothers’ perceptions of NIPT. Findings: Mothers perspectives were nuanced and personal to each woman's circumstance. All mothers highlighted the inevitable association between testing and termination, the importance of autonomy and respecting [m]others’ choices to test and to terminate, and that appropriate supports must be provided to ensure informed decision-making. These perspectives existed within an overarching theme of NIPT reflecting and reinforcing societal attitudes towards disability. Conclusion: Mothers of a child with DS viewed informed decision-making as crucial both prior to undertaking NIPT and following a positive test result. This study adds a unique Australian perspective to the necessary ongoing social and ethical debate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-124
Number of pages7
JournalMidwifery
Volume76
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Down syndrome
  • counseling
  • intellectual disability
  • mothers
  • prenatal diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mothers of a child with Down syndrome : a qualitative analysis of the perspectives on non-invasive prenatal testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this