Museum Practices and the Posthumanities: Curating for Planetary Habitability

Research output: Book/Research ReportAuthored Book

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This book critiques modern museologies and curatorial practices that have been complicit in emerging existential crises. It confidently presents novel, more-than-human curatorial visions, methods, frameworks, policies, and museologies radically refiguring the epistemological foundations of curatorial, museological thinking, and practice for a habitable planet. Modern curatorial and museological practices are dominated by modern humanism in which capital growth, social, technological advancement, hubris, extraction, speciest logics, and colonial domination predominate, often with­out reflection. While history, science, and technology museums and their engagement with non-human worlds have always been ecological as an empiri­cal reality, the human-centred frameworks and forms of human agency that institutions deploy tend to be non-cognizant of this reality. Museum Practices and the Posthumanities: Curating for Planetary Habitability reveals how these practices are ill-equipped to deal with the contemporary world of rapid digital transformations, post-Covid living, climate change, and its impacts among other societal changes, and it shows how museums might best meet these challenges by thinking with and in more-than-human worlds. This book is aimed at museological scholars and museum professionals, and it will provide them with the inspiration to conduct research on and curate from a different ecological reference point to promote a world good enough for all things to thrive in radical co-existence.

Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationU.K.
PublisherRoutledge
Number of pages312
ISBN (Print)9780415792011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Fiona R. Cameron.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Museum Practices and the Posthumanities: Curating for Planetary Habitability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this