Abstract
This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To determine whether nCPAP as the primary modality of treatment is effective and safe for treating respiratory distress in the term neonate (≥ 37 weeks gestation). We will explore potential sources of clinical heterogeneity through the following a priori subgroup analysis: Age of infant at randomisation (< 6 hours, 6 to 12 hours, > 12 hours to 24 hours) Setting (neonatal intensive care unit; non-tertiary special care nursery) Level of continuing distending pressure used (≤ 5 cm H 20; ≥ 6 cm H 20) Types of nCPAP (via continuous flow e.g. bubble nCPAP; variable flow nCPAP e.g. Infant Flow Driver) Delivery system (nasal cannulae (short); nasal cannulae (long); nasal mask) Method of oxygen delivery (ambient oxygen (crib, headbox); low-flow nasal cannulae; high-flow nasal cannulae) Method of birth (caesarean section; vaginal delivery) Reason for respiratory distress (e.g. hyaline membrane disease; transient tachypnoea of the newborn; bacterial pneumonia; meconium aspiration syndrome; persistent pulmonary hypertension). Sensitivity analysis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | CD011962 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
| Volume | 2015 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Nov 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- airway pressure
- neonatal intensive care
- newborn infants
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for term neonates with respiratory distress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver