Natural law and Protestantism : a historical reassessment, and its contemporary significance

Johnathan Stonebraker, Sarah Irving

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    For much of the 20th century, natural law discourse has centred upon the primacy of human reason. Consequently, there has been scepticism towards natural law in much modern Protestant thought because of its critique of reason in post Lapsarian, sinful humanity. This reluctance to engage with natural law, however, is increasingly incongruous in the contemporary global world, in which thinkers from various cultures are attempting to develop universal understandings of ethical principles. Taking this situation as its starting point, this article reassesses the historical relationship between natural law and Protestantism. We argue that historically, there was a tradition of Protestant thought that managed to reconcile its belief in the corruption of human reason, with natural law. Drawing upon this tradition, the article suggests some ways that scholars might tackle the problem of unaided human reason and, in doing so, make fruitful contributions to the contemporary debate. We then argue more broadly for the importance of the relationship between law and religion, and suggest that natural law can facilitate this relationship by serving as a means of articulating the legitimacy and moral force of the law in a global world.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)421-441
    Number of pages21
    JournalOxford Journal of Law and Religion
    Volume4
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • Protestantism
    • natural law
    • religion and law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Natural law and Protestantism : a historical reassessment, and its contemporary significance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this