Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Navigating uncertainty in evidence-informed decision-making for traditional, complementary and integrative medicine: An updated critical interpretive review

  • Jennifer Hunter
  • , Matthew Leach
  • , Dennis Chang
  • , Myeong Soo Lee
  • , Yutong Fei
  • , Jianping Liu
  • UNSW
  • The University of Sydney
  • TAFE SA
  • Western Sydney University
  • Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine
  • Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) presents unique challenges for traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM). To aid decision-making, a critical interpretive review was updated to examine how internationally and nationally endorsed consensus statements on guideline development and policy briefs, along with TCIM-specific recommendations may address these challenges. Methods: The review drew on critical interpretive synthesis and rapid review methods. PubMed, CINAHL and AIMED were searched on 19 January 2024. Single reviewers conducted the screening and extracted descriptive data. Analysis began deductively from the original review themes and developed iteratively. Results: Included were 167 publications. Over the past decade, evidence-to-decision (EtD) frameworks have considered a broader range of modifying factors (e.g., importance of the problem, stakeholder preferences, feasibility, costs, health equity, human rights, social impacts) that may warrant making a stronger recommendation despite lower certainty evidence, and vice versa. Additional strategies proposed by TCIM guideline developers included systematically incorporating multiple evidence sources and developing TCIM extensions for reporting guidelines. Four interrelated themes affirmed the importance of 1) transparent and inclusive decision-making, 2) ensuring the scope and framing of the problem are sensitive to TCIM contexts, 3) using diverse types of evidence in EtD frameworks and when there is evidence uncertainty, and 4) centering equity, including epistemic equity, throughout the EIDM process. Conclusion: Advancing EIDM methodologies specifically for TCIM guideline development and policy can help decision-makers navigate evidence uncertainty to support the appropriate integration of TCIM into global health systems. Protocol registration: International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols: INPLASY202510066.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101231
JournalIntegrative Medicine Research
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Complementary Therapies
  • Decision Making
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Guidelines
  • Policy Brief
  • Traditional medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Navigating uncertainty in evidence-informed decision-making for traditional, complementary and integrative medicine: An updated critical interpretive review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this