New horizons for comparative studies and meta-analyses

P. Pottier, D. W. A. Noble, F. Seebacher, Nicholas C. Wu, S. Burke, M. Lagisz, L. E. Schwanz, S. M. Drobniak, S. Nakagawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparative analyses and meta-analyses are key tools to elucidate broad biological principles, yet the two approaches often appear different in purpose. We propose an integrated approach that can generate deeper insights into ecoevolutionary processes. Marrying comparative and meta-analytic approaches will allow for (i) a more accurate investigation of drivers of biological variation, (ii) a greater ability to account for sources of non-independence in experimental data, (iii) more effective control of publication bias, and (iv) improved transparency and reproducibility. Stronger integration of meta-analytic and comparative studies can also broaden the scope from species-centric investigations to community-level responses and function-valued traits (e.g., reaction norms). We illuminate commonalities, differences, and the transformative potential of combining these methodologies for advancing ecology and evolutionary biology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)435-445
Number of pages11
JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'New horizons for comparative studies and meta-analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this