TY - JOUR
T1 - No widespread decline in canopy conductance under elevated atmospheric CO2
AU - Wang, Guoqiang
AU - Xue, Baolin
AU - Knauer, Jürgen
AU - Helman, David
AU - Tao, Shengli
AU - Luo, Yiqi
AU - Wang, Junping
AU - A, Yinglan
AU - Wang, Yuntao
AU - Jin, Hua'an
AU - Fang, Qingqing
AU - Wang, Qiao
AU - Xiao, Jingfeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2025/8/15
Y1 - 2025/8/15
N2 - Leaf stomatal conductance and transpiration rates have been commonly presumed to decline under elevated CO2 concentrations (eCO2) via partial stomatal closure. While this has great implications for the terrestrial carbon and hydrological balances, eCO2 effects on stomatal conductance and transpiration at the ecosystem scale are highly debatable. Here, we used global ecosystem-level measurements from 78 eddy covariance sites to study long-term trends in canopy conductance (Gc). An empirical canopy conductance model was also used to quantify the separate contributions of CO2, gross primary production (GPP), and vapor pressure deficit (D) to the trends in Gc (dGc/dt). We found that the majority of the 78 sites did not have a significant trend in Gc. Only 15 sites exhibited significant dGc/dt trends, while the direction of the trends was not consistent across these sites. GPP contributed the most to the change in Gc. D played an essential role in regulating Gc, and favorable climates and low D increased Gc even under eCO2. Leaf ambient CO2 concentration (Ca) had a consistent and relatively weak yet negative effect on Gc at most sites. Moreover, a state-of-the-art land surface model (CLM5.0) systematically underestimated Gc for these 78 sites and the model also exhibited a stronger role for CO2 but a weaker role for D in regulating Gc. Our results reveal the lack of widespread effects of eCO2 on Gc, and a state-of-the-art land surface model is unable to accurately capture the Gc trends. Our results indicate that the stomatal suppression of evapotranspiration in response to eCO2 may have been overestimated by these earth system models at large scales. Our findings can help improve models and better project future changes in Gc, evapotranspiration, and runoff in the context of rising CO2 and climate change.
AB - Leaf stomatal conductance and transpiration rates have been commonly presumed to decline under elevated CO2 concentrations (eCO2) via partial stomatal closure. While this has great implications for the terrestrial carbon and hydrological balances, eCO2 effects on stomatal conductance and transpiration at the ecosystem scale are highly debatable. Here, we used global ecosystem-level measurements from 78 eddy covariance sites to study long-term trends in canopy conductance (Gc). An empirical canopy conductance model was also used to quantify the separate contributions of CO2, gross primary production (GPP), and vapor pressure deficit (D) to the trends in Gc (dGc/dt). We found that the majority of the 78 sites did not have a significant trend in Gc. Only 15 sites exhibited significant dGc/dt trends, while the direction of the trends was not consistent across these sites. GPP contributed the most to the change in Gc. D played an essential role in regulating Gc, and favorable climates and low D increased Gc even under eCO2. Leaf ambient CO2 concentration (Ca) had a consistent and relatively weak yet negative effect on Gc at most sites. Moreover, a state-of-the-art land surface model (CLM5.0) systematically underestimated Gc for these 78 sites and the model also exhibited a stronger role for CO2 but a weaker role for D in regulating Gc. Our results reveal the lack of widespread effects of eCO2 on Gc, and a state-of-the-art land surface model is unable to accurately capture the Gc trends. Our results indicate that the stomatal suppression of evapotranspiration in response to eCO2 may have been overestimated by these earth system models at large scales. Our findings can help improve models and better project future changes in Gc, evapotranspiration, and runoff in the context of rising CO2 and climate change.
KW - Atmospheric CO concentration
KW - Canopy conductance
KW - Community Land Model
KW - Evapotranspiration
KW - Gross primary productivity
KW - Stomatal conductance
KW - Temporal trend
KW - Vapor pressure deficit
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105006690515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110649
DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110649
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105006690515
SN - 0168-1923
VL - 371
JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
M1 - 110649
ER -