Noncognitive predictors of intelligence and academic achievement : an important role of confidence

Lazar Stankov

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    76 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Recent evidence about the relationship between cognitive tests and psychological noncognitive variables is reviewed. Noncognitive measures can be ordered with respect to their predictive validity. Many are poor predictors of intelligence and achievement. Measures of rationality, self-assessment of intelligence, Openness to Experience and self-concept correlate up to 35 with cognitive performance. Some domain-specific self-beliefs (self-efficacy and anxiety) have correlations with appropriate achievement tests that can reach 45. The best predictors of any kind of cognitive performance are measures of confidence (frequently reported correlations of 45 and above) that can capture a major part of predictive validity of the three self-beliefs. The role of self-beliefs has attracted much interest in education but their role in predicting performance on tests of fluid intelligence is likely to be low. However, self-beliefs and confidence in particular may prove to be the most potent noncognitive influences on the development of acculturated knowledge that is captured by measures of crystallized intelligence.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)727-732
    Number of pages6
    JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
    Volume55
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Noncognitive predictors of intelligence and academic achievement : an important role of confidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this