Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the practice of off-label prescribing in both in- and outpatient psychiatry practice. Methods: One-hundred inpatient and 100 outpatient medical records from adult patients of an Australian psychiatry service from 2020 to 2021 were examined to determine the prevalence of off-label prescribing as defined by Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) indications, adherence to Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) treatment guidelines, frequency of off-label prescription, and the quality of documentation and informed consent process. Results: Most prescribing events in both in- and outpatient settings were either on-label or off-label but consistent with RANZCP guidelines. Patients with a schizoaffective disorder diagnosis or displaying aggression were most likely to receive off-label prescriptions. There was no significant difference between in- and outpatient groups in the quality of documentation or consent process. Conclusions: In general, off-label prescribing across groups was common, but many decisions were then in line with RANZCP recommendations. That there is a discrepancy between clinical and regulatory bodies has implications for how off-label status is decided.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 196-200 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Australasian Psychiatry |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- off-label prescribing
- on-label prescribing
- prescribing
- psychotropic medication
- treatment guidelines
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Off-label prescribing of psychotropics in a psychiatric patient population in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver