TY - CHAP
T1 - On board the Australian social media ‘ban wagon’
T2 - regulatory theatre, the public child, and the hyper-enthusiastic state
AU - Third, Amanda
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This chapter examines the ‘social media age restrictions’ for under-16s passed into legislation in Australia in 2024. Read as an example par excellence of how the figure of the “public child” (Gilligan, Éire-Ireland 44(1): 265–290, 2009) becomes a site of peak concern and a locus of state intervention, it argues that the age restrictions signal the emergence of a hyper-enthusiastic state overly eager to arbitrate the private domain of child-parent relations. Drawing on Wendy Brown’s concept of “walling” (2010), the chapter interprets the government’s attempt to age-gate social media as a performative assertion of sovereign power that signals the tensions between the sovereign power of the nation-state and transnational corporate actors. Mobilizing archetypal characters, sensationalist claims, and reference to a superficial if not spurious evidence base, the age restrictions further advance a protectionist approach that has long dominated the regulation of children’s digital engagement. Instead, this chapter calls for systemic, carefully formulated regulation that holds platforms and governments accountable to living, breathing children rather than the constructed ‘public child’—a figment of the adult technophobic imagination.
AB - This chapter examines the ‘social media age restrictions’ for under-16s passed into legislation in Australia in 2024. Read as an example par excellence of how the figure of the “public child” (Gilligan, Éire-Ireland 44(1): 265–290, 2009) becomes a site of peak concern and a locus of state intervention, it argues that the age restrictions signal the emergence of a hyper-enthusiastic state overly eager to arbitrate the private domain of child-parent relations. Drawing on Wendy Brown’s concept of “walling” (2010), the chapter interprets the government’s attempt to age-gate social media as a performative assertion of sovereign power that signals the tensions between the sovereign power of the nation-state and transnational corporate actors. Mobilizing archetypal characters, sensationalist claims, and reference to a superficial if not spurious evidence base, the age restrictions further advance a protectionist approach that has long dominated the regulation of children’s digital engagement. Instead, this chapter calls for systemic, carefully formulated regulation that holds platforms and governments accountable to living, breathing children rather than the constructed ‘public child’—a figment of the adult technophobic imagination.
KW - Child online protection
KW - Children’s rights
KW - Mobile/smartphones
KW - Parents and caregivers
KW - Regulation
KW - Social media
KW - Social media age restrictions/social media ban
KW - Sovereignty
KW - The ‘private child’
KW - Youth mental health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105019291952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://go.openathens.net/redirector/westernsydney.edu.au?url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97267-6_2
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-97267-6_2
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-97267-6_2
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:105019291952
SN - 9783031972669
T3 - Studies in Childhood and Youth
SP - 25
EP - 52
BT - The Public Child: Media Power, Strategic Silencing, and Children's Rights in Australia
A2 - Nelson, Camilla
A2 - Buiten, Denise
A2 - Death, Jodi
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
CY - Switzerland
ER -