Abstract
In August 2007, the Australian federal government released the NetAlert filters, the result of an $84 million dollar investment to produce a downloadable software package—colloquially known as the ‘internet porn filter’—that families across the nation could instal on their devices and home computers to minimize the likelihood that children would encounter inappropriate content online. Three days later, 16-year-old high-school student, Tom Wood, famously cracked the filter, in under 30 minutes and with just ‘several clicks’, leaving the software’s icon in the toolbar to fool his parents that the filter was still operating (AAP 2007). In the media frenzy that followed, Wood characterized the software as ‘completely useless’ (ABC 2007) and ‘a horrible waste of money’ (AAP 2007). Indeed, media coverage roundly declared the filter, much to the glee of its opponents, ‘useless’ (ABC 2007) and a total failure, giving lie to ‘the Howard Government’s pre-election pledge to Australian families to protect their youngsters from exposure to inappropriate internet content’ (Nguyen 2007).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Studies in Childhood and Youth |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Pages | 83-128 |
| Number of pages | 46 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Publication series
| Name | Studies in Childhood and Youth |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 2731-6467 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2731-6475 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, The Author(s).
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Online Safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver