Operationalising children's participation : competing understandings of the policy to practice 'gap'

Samia Michail, Kelly Baird, Tobia Fattore, Rebekah Grace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is widespread discourse and policy on children's participation in decision-making. This is not matched with an equal level of implementation in practice. This qualitative research explores the policy to practice gap with senior decision makers in the child protection system in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Their reflections on the challenges associated with translating the participation principles into practice are deconstructed to understand the complex and overlapping ways in which participation is perceived. The research data indicate there are competing understandings of participation at play, depending on the actor, their role and organisation. This paper suggests that genuine participation in practice relies on bridging the epistemic differences and interests of different stakeholder groups who are all critical to achieving children's participation in service decision-making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1576-1595
Number of pages20
JournalChildren and Society
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Children & Society published by National Children's Bureau and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2023 The Authors. Children & Society published by National Children's Bureau and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Operationalising children's participation : competing understandings of the policy to practice 'gap''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this