Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Opportunities and challenges for monitoring terrestrial biodiversity in the robotics age

  • Stephen Pringle
  • , Martin Dallimer
  • , Mark A. Goddard
  • , Léni K. Le Goff
  • , Emma Hart
  • , Simon J. Langdale
  • , Jessica C. Fisher
  • , Sara Adela Abad
  • , Marc Ancrenaz
  • , Fabio Angeoletto
  • , Fernando Auat Cheein
  • , Gail E. Austen
  • , Joseph J. Bailey
  • , Katherine C.R. Baldock
  • , Lindsay F. Banin
  • , Cristina Banks-Leite
  • , Aliyu S. Barau
  • , Reshu Bashyal
  • , Adam J. Bates
  • , Jake E. Bicknell
  • Jon Bielby, Petra Bosilj, Emma R. Bush, Simon J. Butler, Dan Carpenter, Christopher F. Clements, Antoine Cully, Kendi F. Davies, Nicolas J. Deere, Michael Dodd, Rosie Drinkwater, Don A. Driscoll, Guillaume Dutilleux, Mads Dyrmann, David P. Edwards, Mohammad S. Farhadinia, Aisyah Faruk, Richard Field, Robert J. Fletcher, Chris W. Foster, Richard Fox, Richard M. Francksen, Aldina M.A. Franco, Alison M. Gainsbury, Charlie J. Gardner, Ioanna Giorgi, Richard A. Griffiths, Salua Hamaza, Marc Hanheide, Matt W. Hayward, Marcus Hedblom, Thorunn Helgason, Sui P. Heon, Kevin A. Hughes, Edmund R. Hunt, Daniel J. Ingram, George Jackson-Mills, Kelly Jowett, Timothy H. Keitt, Laura N. Kloepper, Stephanie Kramer-Schadt, Jim Labisko, Frédéric Labrosse, Jenna Lawson, Nicolas Lecomte, Ricardo F. de Lima, Nick A. Littlewood, Harry H. Marshall, Giovanni L. Masala, Lindsay C. Maskell, Eleni Matechou, Barbara Mazzolai, Alistair McConnell, Brett A. Melbourne, Aslan Miriyev, Eric Djomo Nana, Alessandro Ossola, Sarah Papworth, Catherine L. Parr, Ana Payo-Payo, Gad Perry, Nathalie Pettorelli, Rajeev Pillay, Simon G. Potts, Miranda T. Prendergast-Miller, Lan Qie, Persie Rolley-Parnell, Stephen J. Rossiter, Marcus Rowcliffe, Heather Rumble, Jon P. Sadler, Christopher J. Sandom, Asiem Sanyal, Franziska Schrodt, Sarab S. Sethi, Adi Shabrani, Robert Siddall, Simón C. Smith, Robbert P.H. Snep, Carl D. Soulsbury, Margaret C. Stanley, Philip A. Stephens, P. J. Stephenson, Matthew J. Struebig, Matthew Studley, Martin Svátek, Gilbert Tang, Nicholas K. Taylor, Kate D.L. Umbers, Robert J. Ward, Patrick J.C. White, Mark J. Whittingham, Serge Wich, Christopher D. Williams, Ibrahim B. Yakubu, Natalie Yoh, Syed A.R. Zaidi, Anna Zmarz, Joeri A. Zwerts, Zoe G. Davies
  • University of Kent
  • Imperial College London
  • Northumbria University
  • Edinburgh Napier University
  • Hornbeam Square
  • University College London
  • SWD
  • Universidade Federal de Rondonópolis
  • Harper Adams University
  • Anglia Ruskin University
  • Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
  • Bayero University
  • Greenhood Nepal
  • Nottingham Trent University
  • Liverpool John Moores University
  • University of Lincoln
  • Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
  • University of East Anglia
  • Digital Ecology Limited
  • University of Bristol
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Open University Milton Keynes
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • Deakin University
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
  • Maden 3
  • University of Cambridge
  • Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  • University of Nottingham
  • University of Reading
  • Butterfly Conservation
  • University of Cumbria
  • University of South Florida
  • Delft University of Technology
  • University of Newcastle
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • University of Edinburgh
  • South East Asia Rainforest Research Partnership
  • British Antarctic Survey
  • University of Leeds
  • Rothamsted Research
  • University of Texas at Austin
  • University of New Hampshire
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research
  • Aberystwyth University
  • Université de Moncton
  • University of Lisbon
  • Scotland's Rural College
  • Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
  • Lancaster University
  • Italian Institute of Technology
  • Heriot-Watt University
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
  • University of Oxford
  • University of California at Davis
  • Royal Holloway University of London
  • University of Liverpool
  • Complutense University
  • George Mason University
  • Zoological Society of London Institute of Zoology
  • University of Northern British Columbia
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • University of the West of England
  • University of Birmingham
  • University of Sussex
  • Fauna & Flora International
  • WWF-Malaysia
  • University of Surrey
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • The University of Auckland
  • Durham University
  • University of Lausanne
  • Bristol Robotics Laboratory
  • Mendel University in Brno
  • Cranfield University
  • Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Trust
  • Newcastle University
  • University of Warsaw
  • Utrecht University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With biodiversity loss escalating globally, a step change is needed in our capacity to accurately monitor species populations across ecosystems. Robotic and autonomous systems (RAS) offer technological solutions that may substantially advance terrestrial biodiversity monitoring, but this potential is yet to be considered systematically. We used a modified Delphi technique to synthesize knowledge from 98 biodiversity experts and 31 RAS experts, who identified the major methodological barriers that currently hinder monitoring, and explored the opportunities and challenges that RAS offer in overcoming these barriers. Biodiversity experts identified four barrier categories: site access, species and individual identification, data handling and storage, and power and network availability. Robotics experts highlighted technologies that could overcome these barriers and identified the developments needed to facilitate RAS-based autonomous biodiversity monitoring. Some existing RAS could be optimized relatively easily to survey species but would require development to be suitable for monitoring of more ‘difficult’ taxa and robust enough to work under uncontrolled conditions within ecosystems. Other nascent technologies (for instance, new sensors and biodegradable robots) need accelerated research. Overall, it was felt that RAS could lead to major progress in monitoring of terrestrial biodiversity by supplementing rather than supplanting existing methods. Transdisciplinarity needs to be fostered between biodiversity and RAS experts so that future ideas and technologies can be codeveloped effectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1031-1042
Number of pages12
JournalNature Ecology and Evolution
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Opportunities and challenges for monitoring terrestrial biodiversity in the robotics age'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this