TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimising spatial planning for green infrastructure from an environmental efficiency perspective
T2 - a case study of the Taipei basin
AU - Lin, Zih Hong
AU - Laffan, Shawn W.
AU - Metternicht, Graciela
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Climate change has resulted in diverse risks to our environment. Green infrastructure is a strategically planned network of urban green spaces that conserve ecosystem functions and benefit people. Resource limitations mean there is a need to measure the environmental efficiency of green infrastructure to support its planning and implementation. However, previous studies on the cost-benefit analysis of green infrastructure often focus on a single benefit, potentially neglecting other co-benefits, or convert multiple benefits into monetary values, which can overlook the non-monetary value of ecosystem services. To address these research gaps, a comprehensive study integrating co-benefits and costs is needed, with a focus on environmental efficiency to yield higher benefits with lower costs. This research uses Super-efficiency slack-based measure data envelopment analysis (Super-SBM-DEA) for integrating multi-input and multi-output indices in evaluating the environmental efficiency of green infrastructure. The results indicate that among the 1415 decision-making units (DMUs), 398 are environmentally efficient. The mean efficiency score is 0.71, suggesting an overall moderate level of efficiency. The slack variable analysis identifies the required improvements for each indicator within each inefficient DMU. DMUs that are more environmentally efficient are priority areas for planning or investing in new green infrastructure, ensuring benefits are maximised while minimising costs. The model provides a comprehensive and replicable approach for prioritising future green infrastructure and developing practical strategies to enhance its efficiency.
AB - Climate change has resulted in diverse risks to our environment. Green infrastructure is a strategically planned network of urban green spaces that conserve ecosystem functions and benefit people. Resource limitations mean there is a need to measure the environmental efficiency of green infrastructure to support its planning and implementation. However, previous studies on the cost-benefit analysis of green infrastructure often focus on a single benefit, potentially neglecting other co-benefits, or convert multiple benefits into monetary values, which can overlook the non-monetary value of ecosystem services. To address these research gaps, a comprehensive study integrating co-benefits and costs is needed, with a focus on environmental efficiency to yield higher benefits with lower costs. This research uses Super-efficiency slack-based measure data envelopment analysis (Super-SBM-DEA) for integrating multi-input and multi-output indices in evaluating the environmental efficiency of green infrastructure. The results indicate that among the 1415 decision-making units (DMUs), 398 are environmentally efficient. The mean efficiency score is 0.71, suggesting an overall moderate level of efficiency. The slack variable analysis identifies the required improvements for each indicator within each inefficient DMU. DMUs that are more environmentally efficient are priority areas for planning or investing in new green infrastructure, ensuring benefits are maximised while minimising costs. The model provides a comprehensive and replicable approach for prioritising future green infrastructure and developing practical strategies to enhance its efficiency.
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Environmental efficiency
KW - Green infrastructure
KW - Super-efficiency slack-based measure data envelopment analysis (Super-SBM-DEA)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105013506227&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126849
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126849
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105013506227
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 393
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
M1 - 126849
ER -