Original and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory in the prediction of executive functioning : a test of relationships between dual systems

Chris J. Jackson, Natalie J. Loxton, Paul Harnett, Joseph Ciarrochi, Matthew J. Gullo

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Executive functioning relates to cognitive processes that are effortful and controlled, whereas processes underlying personality are assumed to be routine and automatic (Elliot & Thrash, 2002, 2010). We evaluated potential influences between these dual systems by examining the link between executive functioning and biologically based personality measures associated with original reinforcement sensitivity theory (o-RST) and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (r-RST). Results showed that flight (a tendency to commit to poorly planned, escape behavior) negatively predicted executive functioning. We find partial support for the general hypothesis of links between the dual systems. Generally, r-RST was a better predictor of executive functioning than o-RST. The proposed structure of the r-RST measurement model was confirmed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)83-88
    Number of pages6
    JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
    Volume56
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Original and revised reinforcement sensitivity theory in the prediction of executive functioning : a test of relationships between dual systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this