Orotracheal intubation in infants performed with a stylet versus without a stylet (Intervention Review)

Joyce E. O'Shea, Jennifer O'Gorman, Aakriti Gupta, Sanjay Sinhal, Jann P. Foster, Liam A. F. O'Connell, C. Omar F. Kamlin, Peter G. Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Neonatal endotracheal intubation is a common and potentially life-saving intervention. It is a mandatory skill for neonatal trainees, but one that is difficult to master and maintain. Intubation opportunities for trainees are decreasing and success rates are subsequently falling. Use of a stylet may aid intubation and improve success. However, the potential for associated harm must be considered. Authors’ conclusions: Current available evidence suggests that use of a stylet during neonatal orotracheal intubation does not significantly improve the success rate among paediatric trainees. However, only one brand of stylet and one brand of endotracheal tube have been tested, and researchers performed all intubations on infants in a hospital setting. Therefore, our results cannot be generalised beyond these limitations.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD011791
Number of pages33
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Volume2017
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • emergency medicine
  • infants
  • intubation
  • pediatrics
  • trachea

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Orotracheal intubation in infants performed with a stylet versus without a stylet (Intervention Review)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this