Out of sight, out of right? : who can be held accountable for detainees harmed on Nauru?

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

Abstract

This chapter argues that people subjected to offshore processing in Nauru who have been harmed by the actions or omissions of the Australian government may have a right to compensation under tort law. Although the arrangements in Nauru are complicated and involve the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the government of Nauru, private contractors such as Chubb Security and Eurest as well as the Australian government, this paper contends that Australia cannot escape its obligation to care for asylum seekers in offshore facilities. Recent case law involving immigration detainees in Australia suggests that Australia has a non-delegable duty of care to asylum seekers and this may extend to asylum seekers Australia has transferred to Nauru for processing.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAsylum Seekers: International Perspectives on Interdiction and Deterrence
EditorsAlperhan Babacan, Linda Briskman
Place of PublicationU.K.
PublisherCambridge Scholars Publishing
Pages82-96
Number of pages15
ISBN (Print)9781847184917
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • refugees
  • asylum seekers
  • detention of persons
  • human rights
  • Nauru
  • Australia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Out of sight, out of right? : who can be held accountable for detainees harmed on Nauru?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this