Abstract
This chapter argues that people subjected to offshore processing in Nauru who have been harmed by the actions or omissions of the Australian government may have a right to compensation under tort law. Although the arrangements in Nauru are complicated and involve the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the government of Nauru, private contractors such as Chubb Security and Eurest as well as the Australian government, this paper contends that Australia cannot escape its obligation to care for asylum seekers in offshore facilities. Recent case law involving immigration detainees in Australia suggests that Australia has a non-delegable duty of care to asylum seekers and this may extend to asylum seekers Australia has transferred to Nauru for processing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Asylum Seekers: International Perspectives on Interdiction and Deterrence |
| Editors | Alperhan Babacan, Linda Briskman |
| Place of Publication | U.K. |
| Publisher | Cambridge Scholars Publishing |
| Pages | 82-96 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781847184917 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- refugees
- asylum seekers
- detention of persons
- human rights
- Nauru
- Australia
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Out of sight, out of right? : who can be held accountable for detainees harmed on Nauru?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver