Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patient and nurse trainer perspectives on a structured PD training programme: A process evaluation of the TEACH-PD feasibility trial

  • Karine E. Manera
  • , Allison Jaure
  • , David W. Johnson
  • , Neil Boudville
  • , Yeoungjee Cho
  • , Kelly Adams
  • , Peter Choi
  • , Keri Lu Equinox
  • , Ana Figueiredo
  • , Carmel M. Hawley
  • , Kirsten Howard
  • , Matthew D. Jose
  • , Anna Lee
  • , Jo Anne Moodie
  • , Peta Anne Paul-Brent
  • , Elaine M. Pascoe
  • , Genevieve Z. Steiner
  • , Melinda Tomlins
  • , David Voss
  • , Josephine S.F. Chow
  • The University of Sydney
  • Children's Hospital at Westmead
  • University of Queensland
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
  • University of Western Australia
  • Hunter New England Local Health District
  • Queensland Health
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
  • University of Tasmania
  • Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • Western Sydney University
  • Counties Manukau Health
  • New South Wales Health
  • Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research
  • University of New South Wales

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study aims to describe patient and nurse trainer perspectives on a structured training programme for peritoneal dialysis (PD) as part of the Targeted Education ApproaCH to improve Peritoneal Dialysis outcomes (TEACH-PD) trial. Methods: Two semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 patients receiving PD and 10 PD nurses involved in training patients in PD before and after receiving training at 2 dialysis units. Transcripts were analysed thematically. Results: Five themes were identified: (1) clear, comprehensive and culturally appropriate (clarity of content and wording to prevent disengagement, gauging patient progress, sufficiency, succinctness and flow); (2) competing priorities and burden (clinical emergencies and tasks taking priority, overwhelmed by amount of content, time pressure demands); (3) improving patient outcomes and safety (ability to assess safety, patient empowerment and personal responsibility, fostering trust and patient wellbeing, increasing technique survival, minimising risk of infection); (4) individualising the approach for patients (setting an appropriate pace, adapting to preferred learning styles, attuning to comprehension and literacy, symptoms and complications limiting capacity for learning) and (5) strengthening competence (motivation for continued learning, putting learning into practice, relevance to real-world practice, requiring structure and consistency, self-efficacy and confidence in problem solving). Conclusion: Patients felt that their training was sufficient and reported feeling confident about doing PD themselves. The adult learning focus of the modules helped the nurse trainers to better adapt their teaching approaches to patients’ individual needs. TEACH-PD training programmes were viewed as an opportunity to upskill nurses involved in patient training and as flexible enough to be adapted to the individual needs of patients. However, nurses also highlighted challenges related to the volume of content to be covered and time constraints due to competing clinical demands.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPeritoneal Dialysis International
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print (In Press) - 2026
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026

Keywords

  • Peritoneal dialysis
  • TEACH-PD
  • process evaluation
  • qualitative

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient and nurse trainer perspectives on a structured PD training programme: A process evaluation of the TEACH-PD feasibility trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this