Patients' views and experiences of pro re nata medication in acute mental health settings

Michelle Cleary, Jan Horsfall, Debra Jackson, Maureen O'Hara-Aarons, Glenn E. Hunt

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In the present study, we interviewed 40 patients in acute inpatient mental health settings regarding their experience of, and views about, receiving pro re nata (PRN) medication. Patient requests for PRN were primarily to relieve anxiety or to aid sleep, and the majority of the participants (80%) could describe a situation where this medication was very helpful. From the perspective of patients, interactions surrounding the immediate administration of PRN medication were inadequate, in that half of the interviewees were simply told to take the medication, and three-quarters said that, in their experience, formal consent was not commonly sought. Three-quarters of respondents came up with alternatives to PRN, and half wanted more information about the medication itself. These findings could contribute to improved nursing assessment for PRN medication need, administration, and monitoring.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)533-539
    Number of pages7
    JournalInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing
    Volume21
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • anxiety
    • consent
    • medication
    • patients
    • psychotropic

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Patients' views and experiences of pro re nata medication in acute mental health settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this