Perceptions of police legitimacy and citizen decisions to report hate crime incidents in Australia

Susann Wiedlitzka, Lorraine Mazerolle, Suzanna Fay-Ramirez, Toby Miles-Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the importance of perceptions of police legitimacy in the decision to report hate crime incidents in Australia. It addresses an identified gap in the literature by analysing the 2011-2012 National Security and Preparedness Survey (NSPS) results to not only explore differences between hate crime and non-hate crime reporting but also how individual characteristics and perceptions of legitimacy influence decisions about reporting crime to police. Using the NSPS survey data, we created three Generalised Linear Latent and Mixed Models (Gllamm), which explore the influence of individual characteristics and potential barriers on the decision to report crime/hate crime incidents to police. Our results suggest that hate crimes are less likely to be reported to police in comparison to non-hate crime incidents, and that more positive perceptions of police legitimacy and police cooperation are associated with the victim's decision to report hate crime victimisation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-106
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Open Access - Access Right Statement

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). As an open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other noncommercial settings.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceptions of police legitimacy and citizen decisions to report hate crime incidents in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this