TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of asphalt mortar with recycled concrete powder under different filler-to-asphalt weight ratios
AU - Lei, Bin
AU - Xiong, Qianghui
AU - Zhao, Hanbing
AU - Dong, Wenkui
AU - Tam, Vivian W. Y.
AU - Sun, Zhihui
AU - Li, Wengui
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - The feasibility of using recycled concrete powder (RCP) as fillers in asphalt mortar is investigated in this study, to achieve a sustainable and economical asphalt production. The differences in physical properties between limestone powder (LSP) and RCP are analyzed and compared. Moreover, the interactions of LSP and RCP with asphalt are studied as well. The properties of asphalt mortar studied include ductility, softening point, penetration, viscous and elastic behaviors of asphalt mortar. Compared to LSP, the RCP presented a rougher surface, additional pores, more complex pore structures, larger Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) surface areas, and smaller particle size. At 0.6 and 0.9 of filler-to-asphalt weight ratio (F/A), the RCP is more effective for the performance enhancement of asphalt mortar compared with the LSP. When the F/A is 0.9 and LSP is completely replaced by RCP, the 15 °C penetration index (PI) and ductility of asphalt mortar decrease by 9.3% and 29.2% respectively. The softening point increases by 5.4%. By contrast, the RCP causes a considerable decrease in PI, equivalent brittle point (T1.2) and ductility when F/A ratio is 1.2. After RCP completely replace LSP, the PI, T1.2, and ductility of asphalt mortar decrease by 47.1%, 44.0%, and 29.0%, respectively. However, at F/A of 0.6, the asphalt mortar with 100% RCP replacement ratio presented both acceptable ductility and plasticity. Under the same temperature and F/A, the complex shear modulus G* and rutting resistance factor G* /sinδ of asphalt mortar raise with the increase of RCP replacement, which indicates that the RCP can better enhance the high-temperature rutting resistance of asphalt mortar than the counterpart LSP. It also implies that the modification of LSP and RCP in asphalt mortar mainly depends on the physical interactions rather than the chemical reactions.
AB - The feasibility of using recycled concrete powder (RCP) as fillers in asphalt mortar is investigated in this study, to achieve a sustainable and economical asphalt production. The differences in physical properties between limestone powder (LSP) and RCP are analyzed and compared. Moreover, the interactions of LSP and RCP with asphalt are studied as well. The properties of asphalt mortar studied include ductility, softening point, penetration, viscous and elastic behaviors of asphalt mortar. Compared to LSP, the RCP presented a rougher surface, additional pores, more complex pore structures, larger Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) surface areas, and smaller particle size. At 0.6 and 0.9 of filler-to-asphalt weight ratio (F/A), the RCP is more effective for the performance enhancement of asphalt mortar compared with the LSP. When the F/A is 0.9 and LSP is completely replaced by RCP, the 15 °C penetration index (PI) and ductility of asphalt mortar decrease by 9.3% and 29.2% respectively. The softening point increases by 5.4%. By contrast, the RCP causes a considerable decrease in PI, equivalent brittle point (T1.2) and ductility when F/A ratio is 1.2. After RCP completely replace LSP, the PI, T1.2, and ductility of asphalt mortar decrease by 47.1%, 44.0%, and 29.0%, respectively. However, at F/A of 0.6, the asphalt mortar with 100% RCP replacement ratio presented both acceptable ductility and plasticity. Under the same temperature and F/A, the complex shear modulus G* and rutting resistance factor G* /sinδ of asphalt mortar raise with the increase of RCP replacement, which indicates that the RCP can better enhance the high-temperature rutting resistance of asphalt mortar than the counterpart LSP. It also implies that the modification of LSP and RCP in asphalt mortar mainly depends on the physical interactions rather than the chemical reactions.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:72986
U2 - 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01834
DO - 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01834
M3 - Article
SN - 2214-5095
VL - 18
JO - Case Studies in Construction Materials
JF - Case Studies in Construction Materials
M1 - e01834
ER -