Perinatal mortality in South Asia : systematic review of observational studies

Pramesh Raj Ghimire, Kingsley E. Agho, Blessing J. Akombi, Nidhi Wali, Michael Dibley, Camille Raynes-Greenow, Andre M. N. Renzaho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to systematically review observational studies on perinatal mortality in South Asia. Methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five computerized bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus were searched for published studies which reported factors associated with perinatal mortality in South Asia from 1 January 2000 to 20 March 2018. All relevant observational studies (cohort, cross-sectional and case-control) were reviewed. Results: Fourteen studies met the selection criteria. The most common factors associated with perinatal mortality were: low socioeconomic status, lack of quality health-care services, pregnancy/obstetric complications and lack of antenatal care. Conclusions: Interventions to reduce perinatal mortality in the South Asia should focus on the provision of adequate antenatal care and quality healthcare services which are accessible to women of low socioeconomic status.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1428
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Keywords

  • South Asia
  • perinatal death
  • poor women
  • prenatal care
  • systematic reviews (medical research)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perinatal mortality in South Asia : systematic review of observational studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this