Philosophies of Difference: A Critical Introduction to Non-philosophy

François Laruelle, Rocco Gangle

    Research output: Creative WorksTextual Works

    Abstract

    In this first English translation of his work, Laruelle explores the major European thinkers from Nietzsche to Derrida to define his own 'non-philosophical' project. A crucial text in the development of Francois Laruelle's oeuvre and an excellent starting point for understanding his broader project, "Philosophies of Difference" offers a theoretical and critical analysis of the philosophers of difference after Hegel and Nietzsche. Laruelle then uses this analysis to introduce a new theoretical practice of non-philosophical thought. Rather than presenting a narrative historical overview, Laruelle provides a series of rigorous critiques of the various interpretations of difference in Hegel, Nietzsche and Deleuze, Heidegger and Derrida. From Laruelle's innovative theoretical perspective, the forms of philosophical difference that emerge appear as variations upon a unique, highly abstract structure of philosophical decision, the self-posing and self-legitimating essence of philosophy itself. Reconceived in terms of philosophical decision, the seemingly radical concept of philosophical difference is shown to configure rather the identity of philosophy as such, which thus becomes manifest as a contingent and no longer absolute form of thinking. The way is thereby opened for initiating a new form of thought, anticipated here with the development of a key notion of non-philosophy, the Vision-in-One. Originally published in French as Les philosophies de la difference, ©Presses Universitaires de France, 1986. This English language edition translated by Rocco Gangle.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationU.K.
    PublisherContinuum
    EditionEnglish language ed.
    Sizexxii, 228 p. ; 21 cm
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Philosophies of Difference: A Critical Introduction to Non-philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this