Physical activity screening to recruit inactive randomized controlled trial participants : how much is too much?

Corneel Vandelanotte, Robert Stanton, Amanda L. Rebar, Anetta K. Van Itallie, Cristina M. Caperchione, Mitch J. Duncan, Trevor N. Savage, Richard R. Rosenkranz, Gregory S. Kolt

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Screening physical activity levels is common in trials to increase physical activity in inactive populations. Commonly applied single-item screening tools might not always be effective in identifying those who are inactive. We applied the more extensive Active Australia Survey to identify inactive people among those who had initially been misclassified as too active using a single-item measure. Those enrolled after the Active Australia Survey screening had significantly higher physical activity levels at subsequent baseline assessment. Thus, more extensive screening measures might result in the inclusion of participants who would otherwise be excluded, possibly introducing unwanted bias.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number446
    Number of pages3
    JournalTrials
    Volume16
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • exercise
    • medical screening
    • randomized controlled trials

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Physical activity screening to recruit inactive randomized controlled trial participants : how much is too much?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this