Pleading intention

Tina Cockburn, Bill Madden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article considers the scope of the application of the civil liability legislation, an issue which is still being clarified by the courts, despite the passage of some ten years since the enactment of the non-uniform civil liability legislation across Australia. The introduction of the civil liability legislation has made more important the pleading of intention, in addition to negligence, so as to maximise damages awards. This involves pleading torts traditionally referred to as intentional torts – particularly trespass to the person. Such an approach is attractive for plaintiffs because, in several jurisdictions, tort claims which plead intention have been excluded from the operation of the legislative restrictions on the quantum of damages awards, and prohibitions on exemplary and aggravated damages. This approach reflects the policy that those who intend the harmful consequences of their actions should be held fully responsible.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-45
Number of pages4
JournalPrecedent
Volume115
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • New South Wales. Civil Liability Act 2002
  • civil law
  • liability (law)
  • negligence
  • Australia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pleading intention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this