Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Polarization position angle standard stars: a reassessment of θ and its variability for seventeen stars based on a decade of observations

  • Daniel V. Cotton
  • , Jeremy Bailey
  • , Lucyna Kedziora-Chudczer
  • , Kimberly Bott
  • , Ain Y. De Horta
  • , Normandy Filcek
  • , Jonathan P. Marshall
  • , Graeme Melville
  • , Derek L. Buzasi
  • , Ievgeniia Boiko
  • , Nicholas W. Borsato
  • , Jean Perkins
  • , Daniela Opitz
  • , Shannon Melrose
  • , Gesa Grüning
  • , Dag Evensberget
  • , Jinglin Zhao
  • Monterey Institute for Research in Astronomy
  • School of Physics
  • University of New South Wales
  • University of Southern Queensland
  • University of California at Riverside
  • University of Washington
  • University of Central Florida
  • York School
  • Willamette University
  • Academia Sinica - Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • University of Wollongong
  • Florida Gulf Coast University
  • Monterey Peninsula College
  • California State University Long Beach
  • Lund University
  • Macquarie University
  • Universidad del Desarrollo
  • University of Oldenburg
  • Leiden University
  • Pennsylvania State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Observations of polarization position angle (θ) standards made from 2014 to 2023 with the High Precision Polarimetric Instrument (HIPPI) and other HIPPI-class polarimeters in both hemispheres are used to investigate their variability. Multiband data were first used to thoroughly recalibrate the instrument performance by bench-marking against carefully selected literature data. A novel co-ordinate difference matrix (CDM) approach – which combines pairs of points – was then used to amalgamate monochromatic (g band) observations from many observing runs and re-determine θ for 17 standard stars. The CDM algorithm was then integrated into a fitting routine and used to establish the impact of stellar variability on the measured position angle scatter. The approach yields variability detections for stars on long time-scales that appear stable over short runs. The best position angle standards are Car, o Sco, HD 154445, HD 161056, and ι1 Sco, which are stable to ≤0.123 . Position angle variability of 0.27–0.82 , significant at the 3σ level, is found for 5 standards, including the Luminous Blue Variable HD 160529 and all but one of the other B/A-type supergiants (HD 80558, HD 111613, HD 183143, and 55 Cyg), most of which also appear likely to be variable in polarization magnitude (p) – there is no preferred orientation for the polarization in these objects, which are all classified as α Cygni variables. Despite this we make six key recommendations for observers – relating to data acquisition, processing and reporting – that will allow them to use these standards to achieve < 0.1 precision in the telescope position angle with similar instrumentation, and allow data sets to be combined more accurately.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1586-1615
Number of pages30
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume535
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s).

Keywords

  • instrumentation: polarimeters
  • supergiants
  • techniques: polarimetric

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Polarization position angle standard stars: a reassessment of θ and its variability for seventeen stars based on a decade of observations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this