Politics, pragmatism and the platform: the ALP and federal industrial relations powers

Thomas Khoshaba, Michael F. Lyons

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paper

Abstract

The High Court challenge to the constitutional validity of the Howard government's 'Work Choices' legislation implies a counter intuitive endorsement of both the theory and practice of federalism by the Australian Labor Party (ALP). By examining the relationship between the ALP and the federal parliament's industrial relations law making powers the paper argues the (failed) litigation of the State ALP governments was consistent with the party's century old tradition to expand federal powers to advance the interests of the labour movement and workers generally. While parallels between the Howard government and past ALP efforts to expand federal industrial relations powers can be identified, these similarities are merely superficial as expanded federal powers are only a means to achieving ALP industrial relations policy and not an end in themselves.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLabour traditions: Proceedings of the Tenth National Labour History Conference, Held at the University of Melbourne, ICT Building Carlton, 4-6 July 2007
PublisherAustralian Society for the Study of Labour History and Business and Labour History Group
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9780980388312
Publication statusPublished - 2007
EventNational Labour History Conference -
Duration: 15 Sept 2011 → …

Conference

ConferenceNational Labour History Conference
Period15/09/11 → …

Keywords

  • Australian Labor Party
  • industrial relations
  • Australia
  • politics and government

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Politics, pragmatism and the platform: the ALP and federal industrial relations powers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this