Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predicting temporal stability and resilience from resistance and recovery

  • Forest Isbell
  • , Akira S. Mori
  • , Michel Loreau
  • , Peter B. Reich
  • , David Tilman
  • , Maggie I. Anderson
  • , Caroline Brophy
  • , Karen Castillioni
  • , Qingqing Chen
  • , Amber C. Churchill
  • , Adam T. Clark
  • , Dylan Craven
  • , Nico Eisenhauer
  • , Hanan C. Farah
  • , Lau A. Gherardi
  • , Yann Hautier
  • , Miao He
  • , Jin Sheng He
  • , Andy Hector
  • , Sydney Hedberg
  • Sarah E. Hobbie, Pubin Hong, Guopeng Liang, Maowei Liang, Shan Luo, Neha Mohanbabu, Shahid Naeem, Pascal A. Niklaus, Xiaobin Pan, Cristy Portales-Reyes, Bernhard Schmid, Harry E. R. Shepherd, Steph Varghese, Michiel P. Veldhuis, Shaopeng Wang, Carmen R. E. Watkins, Qianna Xu, Liting Zheng, Chad R. Zirbel
    • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
    • The University of Tokyo
    • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
    • Peking University
    • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
    • University of California at Santa Barbara
    • Trinity College Dublin
    • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
    • State University of New York Binghamton University
    • University of Graz
    • Ecología y Medio Ambiente
    • Data Observatory Foundation
    • Leipzig University
    • University of California at Berkeley
    • Utrecht University
    • University of Oxford
    • Colorado State University
    • Yale University
    • University of Liverpool
    • Columbia University
    • University of Zurich
    • Saint Louis University
    • King's College London
    • California State University Los Angeles
    • Leiden University
    • University of Oregon
    • University of Wisconsin-Madison

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    9 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Stability can be desirable for many natural and social systems. Temporal stability, the invariability of a system over time, can be enhanced by resisting displacement during perturbations, accelerating recovery after them, or both1, 2, 3–4. Likewise, resilience (sensu proximity to unperturbed levels after a perturbation5, 6, 7, 8, 9–10) also has components of withstanding (resistance) and recovering after perturbations11,12. Here we develop and test new predictions for how temporal stability and resilience depend on their resistance and recovery components. We find that temporal stability could often be predicted from resistance, even without information about how quickly the system recovers. By contrast, resilience is predicted to depend at least as much on recovery as on resistance, as in earlier theory11,12. Using plant productivity data from the world’s longest-running biodiversity experiment, we find that long-term temporal stability, quantified over a quarter century at the ecosystem or species level, is predicted with moderate accuracy from single-year estimates of resistance alone, with only slight improvement by also considering recovery. Resilience was predicted with moderate accuracy by a combination of resistance and recovery at the ecosystem level. We also find that ecosystem drought resistance can be forecasted by monitoring temporal stability before the drought. Our results reveal that long-term temporal stability and short-term resistance may often be predicted from one another and clarify how resistance and recovery can be leveraged to enhance the stability of both natural and managed systems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)394-400
    Number of pages24
    JournalNature
    Volume655
    Issue number8122
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 6 May 2026

    Cite this