Abstract
The 'Global Financial Crisis' is widely acknowledged to be a tail event for neoclassical economics (Stevens, 2008), but it was an expected outcome for a range of non-neoclassical economists from the Austrian and post-Keynesian schools. This article provides a survey of the post-Keynesian approach for readers who are not familiar with this literature. It will briefly cover the history of how post-Keynesian economics came to diverge so much from the neoclassical mainstream, and focus on post-Keynesian macroeconomics today and its alternative indicators of macroeconomic turbulence.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 228-254 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Economic Record |
Volume | 89 |
Issue number | 285 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |