Prediction of birth weight and neonatal adiposity using ultrasound assessment of soft tissue parameters in addition to two-dimensional conventional biometry

Jose Garcia Garcia-Flores, Ritu Mogra, Monica Sadowski, Jon Hyett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: We aim to evaluate the supplementary predictive value of soft tissue markers, including fetal limb volumes, for fetal birth weight and fat tissue weight. Methods: This is a prospective study of 60 patients undergoing term induction of labor. Ultrasound was performed 48 h before birth, and 2D sonographic measurements, subcutaneous tissue thickness, and 3D fetal limb volumes were taken. Birth weight and neonatal fat weight were assessed by plethysmography. Clinical data were collected. The relation between ultrasound and neonatal outcomes was assessed by univariate and multivariate predictive models. The estimated and actual birth weights were compared applying different published formulas, and systematic and random error were collected and compared. Results: 3D fetal limb volumes showed a strong relation to birth weight, absolute weight, and relative fat weight. The Lee 6 formula performed better than either Hadlock 3 or Lee 3 with the lowest random error. Fractional limb volumes involve a highly reproducible technique, with excellent correlation (intra-class coefficient >0.90) for both inter- and intra-observer reliability. The prevalence of estimated EFW measures within 10% error from the actual birth weight was 71.7% with the Hadlock 3 model and 95.0% with the Lee 6 model (p = 0.09). Conclusion: Late assessment of 3D fetal limb volume in upper and lower extremities is not only useful for accurately predicting birth weight but is a useful marker for prediction of birth fat tissue weight.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-208
Number of pages8
JournalFetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction of birth weight and neonatal adiposity using ultrasound assessment of soft tissue parameters in addition to two-dimensional conventional biometry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this