Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel

Ewan K. A. Millar, Peter H. Graham, Sandra A. O'Toole, Catriona M. McNeil, Lois Browne, Adrienne L. Morey, Sarah Eggleton, Julia Beretov, Constantine Theocharous, Anne Capp, Elias Nasser, John H. Kearsley, Geoff Delaney, George Papadatos, Christopher Fox, Robert L. Sutherland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The aim of this study was to determine the clinical utility of intrinsic molecular phenotype after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with lumpectomy and whole-breast irradiation with or without a cavity boost. Four hundred ninety-eight patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled into a randomized trial of BCT with or without a tumor bed radiation boost. Tumors were classified by intrinsic molecular phenotype as luminal A or B, HER-2, basal-like, or unclassified using a five-biomarker panel: estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, CK5/6, and epidermal growth factor receptor. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methodology were used to ascertain relationships to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and death from breast cancer. Median follow-up was 84 months. Three hundred ninety-four patients were classified as luminal A, 23 were luminal B, 52 were basal, 13 were HER-2, and 16 were unclassified. There were 24 IBTR (4.8%), 35 LRR (7%), 47 distant metastases (9.4%), and 37 breast cancer deaths (7.4%). The overall 5-year disease-free rates for the whole cohort were: IBTR 97.4%, LRR 95.6%, DDFS 92.9%, and breast cancer–specific death 96.3%. A significant difference was observed for survival between subtypes for LRR (P = .012), DDFS (P = .0035), and breast cancer–specific death (P = .0482), but not for IBTR (P = .346). The 5-year and 10-year survival rates varied according to molecular subtype. Although this approach provides additional information to predict time to IBTR, LRR, DDFS, and death from breast cancer, its predictive power is less than that of traditional pathologic indices. This information may be useful in discussing outcomes and planning management with patients after BCT.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)4701-4708
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
    Volume27
    Issue number28
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • breast cancer
    • breast neoplasms
    • relapse
    • treatment

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this