TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence of diabetes in people with intellectual disabilities and age- and gender-matched controls : a meta-analysis
AU - Vancampfort, Davy
AU - Schuch, Felipe
AU - Damme, Tine van
AU - Firth, Joseph
AU - Suetani, Shuichi
AU - Stubbs, Brendon
AU - Biesen, Debbie van
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Background: This meta-analysis aims to: (i) describe the pooled prevalence of diabetes in people with intellectual disabilities, (ii) investigate the association with demographic, clinical and treatment-related factors and (iii) compare the prevalence versus age- and gender-matched general population controls. Methods: Pubmed, Embase and CINAHL were searched until 01 May 2021. Random effects meta-analysis and an odds ratio analysis were conducted to compare rates with controls. Results: The trim- and fill-adjusted pooled diabetes prevalence amongst 55,548 individuals with intellectual disabilities (N studies = 33) was 8.5% (95% CI = 7.2%–10.0%). The trim- and fill-adjusted odds for diabetes was 2.46 times higher (95% CI = 1.89–3.21) (n = 42,684) versus controls (n = 4,177,550). Older age (R2 =.83, p <.001), smoking (R2 =.30, p =.009) and co-morbid depression (R2 =.18, p =.04), anxiety (R2 =.97, p <.001), and hypertension (R2 = 0.29, p <.001) were associated with higher diabetes prevalence rates. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that people with intellectual disabilities are at an increased risk of diabetes, and therefore routine screening and multidisciplinary management of diabetes is needed.
AB - Background: This meta-analysis aims to: (i) describe the pooled prevalence of diabetes in people with intellectual disabilities, (ii) investigate the association with demographic, clinical and treatment-related factors and (iii) compare the prevalence versus age- and gender-matched general population controls. Methods: Pubmed, Embase and CINAHL were searched until 01 May 2021. Random effects meta-analysis and an odds ratio analysis were conducted to compare rates with controls. Results: The trim- and fill-adjusted pooled diabetes prevalence amongst 55,548 individuals with intellectual disabilities (N studies = 33) was 8.5% (95% CI = 7.2%–10.0%). The trim- and fill-adjusted odds for diabetes was 2.46 times higher (95% CI = 1.89–3.21) (n = 42,684) versus controls (n = 4,177,550). Older age (R2 =.83, p <.001), smoking (R2 =.30, p =.009) and co-morbid depression (R2 =.18, p =.04), anxiety (R2 =.97, p <.001), and hypertension (R2 = 0.29, p <.001) were associated with higher diabetes prevalence rates. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that people with intellectual disabilities are at an increased risk of diabetes, and therefore routine screening and multidisciplinary management of diabetes is needed.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:71703
U2 - 10.1111/jar.12949
DO - 10.1111/jar.12949
M3 - Article
SN - 1468-3148
SN - 1360-2322
VL - 35
SP - 301
EP - 311
JO - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
JF - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
IS - 2
ER -