Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, and impaired fasting glucose among Māori in Te Wai o Rona: Diabetes prevention strategy

David Simmons, Elaine Rush, Nic Crook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To describe the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) ("dysglycaemia") among Maori. Methods: Te Wai o Rona: Diabetes Prevention Strategy was a trial of lifestyle change among Māori families in the Waikato/Lakes areas of New Zealand. All Māori family household members aged ≥28 years, without known diabetes, were invited to participate through primary care, community, and media approaches. Participants were invited to have an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Results: Of the 3817 eligible Māori, mean BMI was 32.9±7.8 kg/m2 (women) and 33.1±6.7 kg/m2 (men). The age standardised prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was higher among men than women (6.5[5.8-7.4]% vs 4.2[3.6-4.8]%), as was that for IFG (5.4[4.7-6.1]% vs 3.0[2.3-3.5]%), but not IGT (8.5[7.6-9.4]% vs 9.7[8.7-10.6]%) with no rural-urban differences. The prevalence of dysglycaemia increased with increasing BMI with no clear inflection point and was 1.33(1.11-1.60) greater among those with a community services card after adjusting for age, sex and BMI. Conclusions: Undiagnosed diabetes, IGT, and IFG remain common among Māori, particularly men, the very obese, and those with greater socioeconomic disadvantage. There remains significant opportunity to reduce Māori morbidity and premature mortality through diabetes case-finding and intervention.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe New Zealand medical journal
Volume122
Issue number1288
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, and impaired fasting glucose among Māori in Te Wai o Rona: Diabetes prevention strategy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this