TY - JOUR
T1 - Principal morphomic and functional components of secondary mitral regurgitation
AU - Bartko, Philipp E.
AU - Heitzinger, Gregor
AU - Spinka, Georg
AU - Pavo, Noemi
AU - Prausmüller, Suriya
AU - Kastl, Stefan
AU - Winter, Max-Paul
AU - Arfsten, Henrike
AU - Tan, Timothy C.
AU - Gebhard, Catherine
AU - Mascherbauer, Julia
AU - Hengstenberg, Christian
AU - Strunk, Guido
AU - Hülsmann, Martin
AU - Goliasch, Georg
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this work was to identify the key morphological and functional features in secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) and their prognostic impact on outcome. Background: Secondary sMR in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction typically results from distortion of the underlying cardiac architecture. The morphological components which may account for the clinical impact of sMR have not been systematically assessed or correlated with clinical outcomes. Methods: Morphomic and functional network profiling were performed on a cohort of patients with stable heart failure optimized on guideline-based medical therapy. Principal component (PC) analysis and subsequent cluster analysis were used to condense the morphomic and functional data first into PCs with varimax rotation (PCVmax) and second into homogeneous clusters. Clusters and PCs were tested for their correlations with clinical outcomes. Results: Morphomic and functional data from 383 patients were profiled and subsequently condensed into PCs. PCVmax 1 describes high loadings of left atrial morphological information, and PCVmax 2 describes high loadings of left ventricular (LV) topology. Based on these components, 4 homogeneous clusters were derived. sMR was most prominent in clusters 3 and 4, with the morphological difference being left ventricular size (median end-diastolic volume 188 mL [interquartile range: 160 mL-224 mL] vs 315 mL [264 mL-408 mL]; P < 0.001). Clusters were associated with mortality (P < 0.001), but sMR remained independently associated with mortality after adjusting for the clusters (adjusted HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.14–1.77; P < 0.01). The detrimental association of sMR with mortality was mainly driven by cluster 3 (HR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.32-3.60; P = 0.002), the “small LV cavity” phenotype. Conclusions: These results challenge the current perceptions that sMR in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction results exclusively from global or local LV remodeling and are suggestive of a potential role of the left atrial component. The association of sMR with mortality cannot be purely attributed to cardiac morphology alone, supporting other complementary key aspects of mitral valve closure consistent with the force balance theory. Unsupervised clustering supports the association of sMR with mortality predominantly driven by the small LV cavity phenotype, as previously suggested by a conceptional framework and termed disproportionate sMR.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this work was to identify the key morphological and functional features in secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) and their prognostic impact on outcome. Background: Secondary sMR in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction typically results from distortion of the underlying cardiac architecture. The morphological components which may account for the clinical impact of sMR have not been systematically assessed or correlated with clinical outcomes. Methods: Morphomic and functional network profiling were performed on a cohort of patients with stable heart failure optimized on guideline-based medical therapy. Principal component (PC) analysis and subsequent cluster analysis were used to condense the morphomic and functional data first into PCs with varimax rotation (PCVmax) and second into homogeneous clusters. Clusters and PCs were tested for their correlations with clinical outcomes. Results: Morphomic and functional data from 383 patients were profiled and subsequently condensed into PCs. PCVmax 1 describes high loadings of left atrial morphological information, and PCVmax 2 describes high loadings of left ventricular (LV) topology. Based on these components, 4 homogeneous clusters were derived. sMR was most prominent in clusters 3 and 4, with the morphological difference being left ventricular size (median end-diastolic volume 188 mL [interquartile range: 160 mL-224 mL] vs 315 mL [264 mL-408 mL]; P < 0.001). Clusters were associated with mortality (P < 0.001), but sMR remained independently associated with mortality after adjusting for the clusters (adjusted HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.14–1.77; P < 0.01). The detrimental association of sMR with mortality was mainly driven by cluster 3 (HR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.32-3.60; P = 0.002), the “small LV cavity” phenotype. Conclusions: These results challenge the current perceptions that sMR in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction results exclusively from global or local LV remodeling and are suggestive of a potential role of the left atrial component. The association of sMR with mortality cannot be purely attributed to cardiac morphology alone, supporting other complementary key aspects of mitral valve closure consistent with the force balance theory. Unsupervised clustering supports the association of sMR with mortality predominantly driven by the small LV cavity phenotype, as previously suggested by a conceptional framework and termed disproportionate sMR.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:64881
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.05.020
DO - 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.05.020
M3 - Article
SN - 1876-7591
VL - 14
SP - 2288
EP - 2300
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 12
ER -