Property management orders in the mental health context : protection or empowerment?

Fleur Beaupert, Terry Carney, David Tait, Vivienne Topp

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Control over personal property is something most citizens take for granted. Yet historically, such control was automatically and indefinitely denied to people involuntarily detained in mental institutions. Adult guardianship reforms in the 1980s established multi-disciplinary guardianship tribunals to replace resort to the inherent protective jurisdiction of superior courts. The new guardianship legislation introduced presumptions favouring orders involving minimal restrictions on Iiberty.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)795-824
    Number of pages30
    JournalUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal
    Volume31
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • people with mental disabilities
    • mental health laws
    • guardianship
    • human rights
    • property management
    • Australia

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Property management orders in the mental health context : protection or empowerment?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this