Prosecutor v. Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-302, decision under Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the non-compliance by South Africa with the request by the Court for the arrest and surrender of Omar Al-Bashir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

On July 6, 2017, Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court (the Court or ICC)"”composed of Judges Tarfusser, Perrin de Brichambaut, and Chung"”held that South Africa violated the Rome Statute of the ICC (Rome Statute) by failing to arrest and surrender to the Court President Omar Al-Bashir of Sudan when he visited the country in June 2015. However, the Court did not refer the matter to the ICC Assembly of States Parties (ASP) or the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) pursuant to Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute. The decision added South Africa to a list of ICC state parties that have failed in their Rome Statute obligations with respect to the incumbent head of state of Sudan. It also marked the first time that the ICC Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), all ICC states parties, and the United Nations (UN) were invited to present their views and argue fully what is perhaps the most legally contentious and politically sensitive issue that the ICC has faced in its history.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1007-1013
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of International Law
Volume111
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Bashīr, ʻUmar Ḥasan Aḥmad, 1944-
  • International Criminal Court
  • South Africa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prosecutor v. Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-302, decision under Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the non-compliance by South Africa with the request by the Court for the arrest and surrender of Omar Al-Bashir'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this