TY - JOUR
T1 - Prosecutor v. Al-Bashir, ICC-02/05-01/09-302, decision under Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute on the non-compliance by South Africa with the request by the Court for the arrest and surrender of Omar Al-Bashir
AU - Ventura, Manuel J.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - On July 6, 2017, Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court (the Court or ICC)"”composed of Judges Tarfusser, Perrin de Brichambaut, and Chung"”held that South Africa violated the Rome Statute of the ICC (Rome Statute) by failing to arrest and surrender to the Court President Omar Al-Bashir of Sudan when he visited the country in June 2015. However, the Court did not refer the matter to the ICC Assembly of States Parties (ASP) or the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) pursuant to Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute. The decision added South Africa to a list of ICC state parties that have failed in their Rome Statute obligations with respect to the incumbent head of state of Sudan. It also marked the first time that the ICC Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), all ICC states parties, and the United Nations (UN) were invited to present their views and argue fully what is perhaps the most legally contentious and politically sensitive issue that the ICC has faced in its history.
AB - On July 6, 2017, Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court (the Court or ICC)"”composed of Judges Tarfusser, Perrin de Brichambaut, and Chung"”held that South Africa violated the Rome Statute of the ICC (Rome Statute) by failing to arrest and surrender to the Court President Omar Al-Bashir of Sudan when he visited the country in June 2015. However, the Court did not refer the matter to the ICC Assembly of States Parties (ASP) or the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) pursuant to Article 87(7) of the Rome Statute. The decision added South Africa to a list of ICC state parties that have failed in their Rome Statute obligations with respect to the incumbent head of state of Sudan. It also marked the first time that the ICC Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), all ICC states parties, and the United Nations (UN) were invited to present their views and argue fully what is perhaps the most legally contentious and politically sensitive issue that the ICC has faced in its history.
KW - Bashīr, ʻUmar Ḥasan Aḥmad, 1944-
KW - International Criminal Court
KW - South Africa
UR - http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:45685
U2 - 10.1017/ajil.2017.95
DO - 10.1017/ajil.2017.95
M3 - Article
SN - 0002-9300
VL - 111
SP - 1007
EP - 1013
JO - American Journal of International Law
JF - American Journal of International Law
IS - 4
ER -