Prosecutor v Karadžić (ICTY, Case No IT-95-5/18) : the indictment, English language and Holbrooke Agreement decisions

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This case note discusses the final pre-trial indictment, including the alleged forms of criminal responsibility and the charges in the Karadžić case currently before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ('ICTY'). In addition, two decisions of the ICTY Appeals Chamber are discussed. The first dealt with an application by the Prosecution for a determination that Karadžić, as a self-represented accused, understood the English language for the purposes of disclosure and translation ('Language Decision'). The second concerned Karadžić's allegation of the existence of a secret agreement between his representatives and the United States diplomat Richard Holbrooke that Karadžić would not face prosecution at the ICTY if he resigned from political and public life ('Holbrooke Decision').
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)241-257
    Number of pages17
    JournalAustralian International Law Journal
    Volume16
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • war crimes
    • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    • indictments
    • English language
    • Karadžić, Radovan V., 1945-

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Prosecutor v Karadžić (ICTY, Case No IT-95-5/18) : the indictment, English language and Holbrooke Agreement decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this