TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective analysis of the utility of 18-FDG PET in Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin : a Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study, TROG 09:03
AU - Poulsen, Michael
AU - Macfarlane, David
AU - Veness, Michael
AU - Estall, Venessa
AU - Hruby, George
AU - Kumar, Mahesh
AU - Pullar, Andrew
AU - Tripcony, Lee
AU - Rischin, Danny
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Introduction: TROG 09.03 prospectively studied the utility of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) PET in the management of Merkel cell carcinoma of skin. Methods: Following consent and registration, a pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT was performed. Sites of avid disease were confirmed by cytology where practicable. Following surgery, patients with AJCCv7 Stages IIA-IIIB disease were treated with chemo-radiotherapy and reassessed with a post-treatment PET. Results: Fifty-eight subjects (45 males and 13 females, median age 68 years) were enrolled between 2011 and 2015, 43 patients of whom went on to receive chemo-radiotherapy. An occult primary was present in 22 (37.9%), T1 in 22 (37.9%) and T2 disease in 14 (24.1%). Nodal disease was present in 69% of cases. Fifty per cent of subjects had gross residual disease at the primary site and/or nodal site at the time of registration. 18-FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity of 94.74% (95% CI 82-99.3%) and a specificity of 88.24% (95% CI 63.56-98.54). The positive predictive value was 94.74% (83.01-98.51) and the negative predictive value was 88.24% (95% CI 65.81-96.69). The pre-treatment PET influenced a treatment decision in 27.6% of cases. Upstaging occurred in 15 (25.9%), with no down staging. Other diseases were identified in 4 (6.9%) patients. Univariate analysis failed to demonstrate that pre-treatment SUV levels or a negative post-treatment PET had any impact on overall survival. PET staged patients had 89% 3-year in-field loco-regional control and 76% 3-year overall survival. Conclusion: Staging 18-FDG-PET significantly influenced treatment decisions in approximately one-third of cases of MCC and should be considered in the routine pre-treatment work-up. Post-treatment PET was not found to be prognostic. Funding through the Medicare Benefits Schedule needs to be considered for high risk MCC.
AB - Introduction: TROG 09.03 prospectively studied the utility of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) PET in the management of Merkel cell carcinoma of skin. Methods: Following consent and registration, a pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT was performed. Sites of avid disease were confirmed by cytology where practicable. Following surgery, patients with AJCCv7 Stages IIA-IIIB disease were treated with chemo-radiotherapy and reassessed with a post-treatment PET. Results: Fifty-eight subjects (45 males and 13 females, median age 68 years) were enrolled between 2011 and 2015, 43 patients of whom went on to receive chemo-radiotherapy. An occult primary was present in 22 (37.9%), T1 in 22 (37.9%) and T2 disease in 14 (24.1%). Nodal disease was present in 69% of cases. Fifty per cent of subjects had gross residual disease at the primary site and/or nodal site at the time of registration. 18-FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity of 94.74% (95% CI 82-99.3%) and a specificity of 88.24% (95% CI 63.56-98.54). The positive predictive value was 94.74% (83.01-98.51) and the negative predictive value was 88.24% (95% CI 65.81-96.69). The pre-treatment PET influenced a treatment decision in 27.6% of cases. Upstaging occurred in 15 (25.9%), with no down staging. Other diseases were identified in 4 (6.9%) patients. Univariate analysis failed to demonstrate that pre-treatment SUV levels or a negative post-treatment PET had any impact on overall survival. PET staged patients had 89% 3-year in-field loco-regional control and 76% 3-year overall survival. Conclusion: Staging 18-FDG-PET significantly influenced treatment decisions in approximately one-third of cases of MCC and should be considered in the routine pre-treatment work-up. Post-treatment PET was not found to be prognostic. Funding through the Medicare Benefits Schedule needs to be considered for high risk MCC.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:63936
U2 - 10.1111/1754-9485.12705
DO - 10.1111/1754-9485.12705
M3 - Article
SN - 1754-9477
VL - 62
SP - 412
EP - 419
JO - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
JF - Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
IS - 3
ER -