Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prostate adenocarcinoma grade group 1: rationale for retaining a cancer label in the 2022 World Health Organization Classification

  • George J. Netto
  • , Mahul B. Amin
  • , Eva M. Compérat
  • , Anthony J. Gill
  • , Arndt Hartmann
  • , Holger Moch
  • , Santosh Menon
  • , Maria R. Raspollini
  • , Mark A. Rubin
  • , John R. Srigley
  • , Puay Hoon Tan
  • , Satish K. Tickoo
  • , Toyonori Tsuzuki
  • , Samra Turajlic
  • , Ian Cree
  • , Daniel M. Berney
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
  • University of Southern California
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • The University of Sydney
  • Royal North Shore Hospital
  • Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • University of Zurich
  • Homi Bhabha National Institute
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi
  • University of Bern
  • University of Toronto
  • Singapore General Hospital
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Aichi Medical University
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer
  • Queen Mary University of London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Gleason system forms the basis for prostate cancer grading worldwide. It has been modified on several occasions, most recently after the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conferences in 2005, 2014, and 2019, and the 2019 white paper by the Genitourinary Pathology Society. At the 2014 ISUP conference the concept of grade groups (GG1–GG5) was introduced, also referred to as ISUP grade, World Health Organization [WHO] grade, or simply grade groups. Grade groups are based on Gleason scores and have some advantages with respect to communication of results to patients, clinicians, and researchers. Grade groups offer the advantage of appropriately assigning the lowest rank (GG1) to Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 = 6 cancers to emphasize their generally low risk in the proper clinical context (eg, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] <10 ng/ml and clinical stage ≤cT2a).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-303
Number of pages3
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prostate adenocarcinoma grade group 1: rationale for retaining a cancer label in the 2022 World Health Organization Classification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this