Pulmonary function reductions among potentially susceptible subgroups of agricultural workers in Colorado and Nebraska

  • Stephen J. Reynolds
  • , Maggie L. Clark
  • , Niels Koehncke
  • , Susanna Von Essen
  • , Linda Prinz
  • , Thomas J. Keefe
  • , John Mehaffy
  • , Mary Bradford
  • , Brian Cranmer
  • , Margaret E. Davidson
  • , Ivana V. Yang
  • , James B. Burch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Organic dust inhalation has been associated with adverse respiratory responses among agricultural workers. We evaluated factors that may confer increased susceptibility to these health effects. Methods: We quantified personal work shift exposures to inhalable dust, endotoxin, and its 3-hydroxy fatty acid constituents, and evaluated changes in pulmonary function among 137 grain elevator, cattle feedlot, dairy, and corn farm workers. Results: Increased dust exposure was associated with work shift reductions in lung function. Although interpretation is limited because of small samples, a suggestion of stronger exposure-response relationships was observed among smokers, as well as workers reporting pesticide/herbicide application, asthma, or allergies, and those with genetic polymorphisms (TLR4) (Pinteraction ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: A better understanding of factors leading to increased susceptibility of adverse respiratory outcomes is needed to optimize exposure reduction strategies and develop more comprehensive wellness programs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)632-641
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume54
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • agricultural laborers
  • diseases
  • lung
  • respiratory organs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pulmonary function reductions among potentially susceptible subgroups of agricultural workers in Colorado and Nebraska'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this