Abstract
Industrial relations research that attempts to grapple with individuals’ union-related sentiments and activities often draws on one of two traditions of psychological research—the individual-level factors tradition (for example, personality and attitude-behaviour relations) and the social context tradition (for example, frustration-aggression and relative deprivation). This paper provides an overview of research conducted from within these traditions to explain union-related phenomena and identifies some of the limitations that arise as a consequence of a shared tendency to treat people in an atomistic fashion. The paper argues for an understanding of the psychological processes that underpin group-based action. To this end, it elaborates a theoretical framework based on social identity theory and self-categorisation theory that would allow us to examine the dynamic interplay between the individual, their cognitions and their environment. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of a specific case of union mobilisation, to indicate how this theoretical framework might aid empirical analysis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 485-504 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Journal of Industrial Relations |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2003 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Putting the Group Back into Unions: A Social Psychological Contribution to Understanding Union Support'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver