Quality assessment and certification in open scholarly publishing and inspiration for MOOC credentialing

Xiang Ren

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

Abstract

This chapter looks at the changing landscape of quality assessment and certification/credentialing in open knowledge systems by a comparative study between open publishing and open education. Despite the disruptive changes driven by open publishing in scholarly communication, it is challenging to develop widely accepted methods for quality assessment and certification. Similar challenges exist in open education platforms like the massive open online course (MOOC). This work reviews four types of innovations in open publishing in terms of quality control, namely “light touch” peer review, post-publication assessment, social peer review, and open peer review. Synthesising the principles and strategies of these innovations, it discusses how they might be inspiring for developing solutions and models for MOOC assessment and credentialing. This chapter concludes by suggesting future research directions. It argues that the open initiatives are co-evolving with the “traditional” systems and integrating with the established models.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOpen Learning and Formal Credentialing in Higher Education: Curriculum Models and Institutional Policies
EditorsShirley Reushle, Amy Antonio, Mike Keppell
Place of PublicationU.S.
PublisherIGI Global
Pages245-262
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781466688575
ISBN (Print)9781466688568
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • online learning and distance education
  • scholarly publishing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality assessment and certification in open scholarly publishing and inspiration for MOOC credentialing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this