Quantitative evaluation of bolt pre-load using coda wave interferometry and nonlinear coda wave interferometry: a comparative study

Lei Wang, Shanchang Yi, Xiangtao Sun, Yang Yu, Bijan Samali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The quantitative evaluation of bolt pre-load is crucial for the maintenance and prevention of accidents in bolt-connected structures. This study introduces the coda wave interferometry (CWI) method and the nonlinear coda wave interferometry (NCWI) method for quantitative evaluation of bolt pre-load. Experimental tests across three different scales of bolt pre-load changes were conducted on a bolt to compare the performances of CWI and NCWI in the quantitative evaluation of bolt pre-load. The results demonstrate that both CWI and NCWI can effectively characterize changes in bolt pre-load. For CWI, the relative velocity change (∆v/v) exhibits a linear relationship with the bolt pre-load. Meanwhile, for NCWI, the effective nonlinear level, denoted as αΔv/v, demonstrates a quadratic dependence on the bolt pre-load. In CWI, the calculation of ∆v/v is dependent on the correlation coefficient between the coda waves of signals before and after bolt pre-load changes. It is prone to failure when there are significant changes in bolt pre-load. Conversely, NCWI demonstrates enhanced robustness in evaluating bolt pre-load changes across a range of magnitudes.

Original languageEnglish
Article number124495
Pages (from-to)563-573
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Keywords

  • Bolt pre-load
  • Coda wave interferometry
  • Nonlinear coda wave interferometry
  • Stretching method
  • Ultrasonic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative evaluation of bolt pre-load using coda wave interferometry and nonlinear coda wave interferometry: a comparative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this