TY - JOUR
T1 - Quasi-monopolar electrical stimulation of the retina : a computational modelling study
AU - Abramian, Miganoosh
AU - Lovell, Nigel H.
AU - Habib, Amgad
AU - Morley, John W.
AU - Suaning, Gregg J.
AU - Dokos, Socrates
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Objective. In this study we investigated the feasibility of quasi-monopolar (QMP) electrical stimulation for retinal implant devices, using a computational model of the retinal ganglion cell layer. Approach. When used with hexagonally arrayed multiple electrodes, QMP stimulation is a hybrid of hexapolar and conventional monopolar stimulus modes. In hexapolar mode, each active electrode is surrounded by six guards which collectively return the stimulus current, whereas in monopolar mode the injected stimulus current is returned through a distant return electrode. The QMP paradigm, on the other hand, distributes the return current between the guard electrodes as well as the distant return. The electrodes tested were 25, 50 and 100 m in diameter, with hexagonally arranged centre-to-centre spacing of either double or quadruple this diameter. Main results. Simulation results indicated that electrode size had minimal effects on subretinal threshold currents, whilst electrode configuration and centre-to-centre spacing played major roles in determining thresholds and spatial activation patterns. Threshold charge densities for 50 and 100 m electrodes were generally within the safe limit. Significance. We found that QMP stimulation offers greater advantages compared to monopolar and hexapolar stimulation, in that it combines the low thresholds of monopolar stimulation with the localized spatial activation achieved with hexapolar electrodes during parallel stimulation.
AB - Objective. In this study we investigated the feasibility of quasi-monopolar (QMP) electrical stimulation for retinal implant devices, using a computational model of the retinal ganglion cell layer. Approach. When used with hexagonally arrayed multiple electrodes, QMP stimulation is a hybrid of hexapolar and conventional monopolar stimulus modes. In hexapolar mode, each active electrode is surrounded by six guards which collectively return the stimulus current, whereas in monopolar mode the injected stimulus current is returned through a distant return electrode. The QMP paradigm, on the other hand, distributes the return current between the guard electrodes as well as the distant return. The electrodes tested were 25, 50 and 100 m in diameter, with hexagonally arranged centre-to-centre spacing of either double or quadruple this diameter. Main results. Simulation results indicated that electrode size had minimal effects on subretinal threshold currents, whilst electrode configuration and centre-to-centre spacing played major roles in determining thresholds and spatial activation patterns. Threshold charge densities for 50 and 100 m electrodes were generally within the safe limit. Significance. We found that QMP stimulation offers greater advantages compared to monopolar and hexapolar stimulation, in that it combines the low thresholds of monopolar stimulation with the localized spatial activation achieved with hexapolar electrodes during parallel stimulation.
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/545934
U2 - 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/025002
DO - 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/025002
M3 - Article
SN - 1741-2552
VL - 11
JO - Journal of Neural Engineering
JF - Journal of Neural Engineering
IS - 2
M1 - 25002
ER -