Abstract
The paper examines racism’s ‘debatability’ by looking at the interpellation of public acts of racism. The idea of racism as an event appears crucial to the judgment of its legitimacy. By examining racism as a disjointed series of public events that are often accompanied by elisions of the connections between racist ‘eruptions’ and systemic conditions, I shine light on what is meant by racism today. Racism can be theorized dually as both frozen and motile. This is due to emphasis being placed on what race is taken to be, rather than on what it does. Confusion over how to formulate anti-racism is based on this misconception of race at the core of much anti-racist thought, leading to an obscuration of racism. Critically examining some contemporary anti-racist activity, I briefly assess the role played by those who challenge racism in legitimizing or negating official interpretations of racism in contemporary Australia.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 33-48 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Ethnic and Racial Studies |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Australia
- anti-racism
- emigration and immigration
- political refugees
- racism