Rauschen vs. kontrolle : eine parabel gegen die modellierung der zukunft

Translated title of the contribution: Noise hates control : a parable against modelling the future, circuit breaking revolt

Geert Lovink, Ned Rossiter

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

Abstract

Models assume containment, they presume the three P’s rule: prediction, preemption, prevention. The ultimate technology of control, models exists in a closed, self-referential world of uninterrupted flows. No matter how dynamic the design of models, parameters are always and necessarily limited. Inputs/outputs, but never contingency: the revolt of the disaffected. Noise is the enemy of dashboard governance. This essay tests the status of noise today. Or rather, the status of the test is tested by noise. Noise is considered the original counterpart of the signal and heavily featured in all early theories of communication and cybernetics. In this all-digital age it looked, for a brief moment, as if noise had been conquered, negated, crushed. But then, inevitably, the suppressed returned. Noise returned as the unexpected revenge of externalities. The constitutive outside that forces change as the illegitimate agent. Filters break down, a virus enters the system, the inner psychic armour can no longer manage all the information. Big data become meaningless. Flows still flow but the digital perfection is one without a purpose.
Translated title of the contributionNoise hates control : a parable against modelling the future, circuit breaking revolt
Original languageGerman
Title of host publicationDie Unsichtbare Hand des Plans: Koordination und Kalkül im Digitalen Kapitalismus = The Invisible Hand of the Plan: Coordination and Calculus in Digital Capitalism
EditorsTimo Daum, Sabine Nuss
Place of PublicationGermany
PublisherDietz Verlag Berlin GmbH
Pages231-245
Number of pages15
ISBN (Print)9783320023829
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Noise hates control : a parable against modelling the future, circuit breaking revolt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this