Abstract
We agree that POP-Q stage definitions are not evidence based but doubt whether the proposed IUC definition is optimal, given currently available data.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 643-644 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Urogynecology |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2025 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver